Error rating book.
Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Citations per year
Return to Book Page. Preview — Who Rules the Net? Who Rules the Net? This book considers the threats to free speech and online commerce posed by international goverment attempting to impose such territorial statutes and standards within cyberspace.
Everybody Wants to Rule the Web
Get A Copy. Hardcover , pages. More Details Original Title. Other Editions 3.
Internet governance | GIP Digital Watch
Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Who Rules the Net? A distinction could be made by harmonisation on substance and harmonisaton of procedures. Fehlinger summarised that on some rare issues, such as child abuse images on the internet, "it is likely to achieve an international, universal consensus between governments through traditional Westphalian cooperation mechanism such as treaties.
Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.
- Murky international laws threaten to break up the internet as we know it.
- What's really at stake in the Microsoft v. USA decision - Internet Governance Project!
- Everybody Wants to Rule the Web | Cato Institute.
- Gouvernance de l'Internet?
- See a Problem?.
- Queen Elizabeth Class Battleships (Ensign 4),.
Who Rules the Net?: Internet Governance and Jurisdiction
Google and Netflix. This allows the option for specialised services, which would be modelled separately, but the FCC would monitor any agreements that come close to paid prioritisation. In fact, it seems that specialised services will also be allowed in the EU, although it is as yet unclear how the negotiations will unfold. Jurisdiction issues are gaining attention after the French court established jurisdiction in a case involving a French teacher's Facebook account being blocked after posting an image of an painting. Facebook considered the image pornography rather than art. Kurbalija said that the French court seized jurisdiction based on the domicile of the plaintiff.
These developments demonstrate that decisions in Europe on issues like jurisdiction and privacy are expected to have an impact on a broader level, whereas issues like net neutrality are largely affected by developments in the USA. Taking place every four years under the auspices of the UNODC, the conference is expected to discuss whether the Cybercrime Convention can be expanded to cover other cybercrime issues. The conference will convene governments, civil society, and corporate sectors.
The focus will be on cybersecurity, economic developments, and human rights. The outcome is expected to be the launch of a Global Cyber Resilience Initiative, where partners can share their cyber expertise and collaborate.
The IANA Transition Naming Community is expected to publish its second draft proposal on naming-related functions on 20 April, which will be open for public comment for 30 days.